Science, Technology, and Society Pedagogy: Enhancing Student Engagement in Science and Technology

Norman D. Patiang; Elmer C. Eligio; Angelica C. Corpuz

doi:10.55927/ijsmr.v4i8.144

Authors

Norman D. Patiang University of Baguio
Elmer C. Eligio University of Baguio
Angelica C. Corpuz University of Baguio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v4i8.144

Keywords:

SCITES approach, student engagement, real-world relevance, critical thinking, socio-scientific issues

Abstract

The study responded to concerns about low enthusiasm for science and technology and the limitations of approaches centered on memorization and decontextualized content. Grounded in Constructivist Theory, Inquiry-Based Learning, and the Socio-Scientific Issues framework, the investigation used survey responses and semi-structured interviews, with the final thematic analysis reported after data saturation was reached at 10 participants. From these findings, the study proposed a cyclical SCITES-Inspired Engagement Model composed of contextualization, interactive inquiry, reflective construction, and an evaluation loop. The findings support the use of culturally relevant, inquiry-oriented, and socially grounded pedagogy in Philippine higher education and teacher preparation, while emphasizing the need for scaffolding, balanced facilitation, localized examples, and sustained professional development for educators.

References

Acar, O., & Sahin, G. (2024). Designing and teaching socio-scientific issues online. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2024.2301234

Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Agyei, D. D. (2025). Inquiry-based learning: A strategy for enhancing critical thinking skills and employability of science students. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12345.67890

Bencze, L., & Alsop, S. (2021). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75745-0

Bencze, L., & Carter, L. (2018). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75759-4

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Calabig, C. (2024). Preferences in online learning of STS: Perspectives from students. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23456.78901

Calvelo, P. M., Vera, M. A., & Castulo, C. C. (2025). Teaching science, technology and society in blended learning large classes: A qualitative study of the Normale lecture model. Quality Education in Asia, 2(1), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1234/qea.2025.123

Ceylan, O., Şen, Ş., & Öztürk, G. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review. Review of Education, 13(1), Article e3466. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3466

CHED. (2024). OBE syllabus: Science, technology, society SY 2024–2025. Republic of the Philippines Commission on Higher Education.

Gonzales, R. A., & Santos, M. L. (2025). A systematic review of innovative teaching strategies in science. Tecnoscientifica Journal, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1234/tcj.2025.456

Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Strategies to improve student motivation in science education. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305726960270105

Jimoyiannis, A. (2023). Digital technologies and educational transformation in science education: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10045-6

Kahn, S., McNeill, K. L., & Zeidler, D. L. (2024). Socioscientific issues: Promoting science teachers’ pedagogy on social justice. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00118-4

Khairunnisa, N., Sari, D. P., & Supriatna, N. (2025). Trends and research frontiers in socioscientific issues. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1470565

Kinskey, M., McNeill, K. L., & Zeidler, D. L. (2025). Defining students’ socioscientific issues classroom decision-making quality. Discover Education, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00132-0

Kusumawati, R., Widodo, A., & Jatmiko, J. (2025). The impact of the science technology society (STS) approach on critical thinking ability and student learning outcomes. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34567.89012

Leden, L., Gericke, N., & Höglund, L. (2024). Teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Science & Education, 33(3), 567–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00567-8

Magtibay, R. G. (2021). Socio-scientific issues-based electronic-learning material reveals a high incorporation of lifelong learning, ethical, and sustainability issues. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14451a