Mastering Digital Leadership Orchestration in Organizational Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Yuliati Yuliati STIE Pelita Nusantara
  • Susanti Wahyuningsih STIE Pelita Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v4i6.76

Keywords:

Digital Leadership, Dynamic Capability Theory, Technology Integration, Organizational Transformation, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

In the era of Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA), digital transformation has become an absolute prerequisite for organizational survival, yet global success rates remain below 30%. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) follows PRISMA 2020 standards to synthesize digital leadership orchestration mechanisms and technology integration in mediating organizational performance transformation. Analyzing 17 primary documents from Scopus and Web of Science (2010–2026), thematic analysis reveals three dominant orchestration patterns: digital leadership as an innovation determinant, organizational culture as a critical filter mechanism, and the digital productivity paradox at the individual level. Middle Range Theory (MRT) propositions confirm technology as a “hygiene factor” requiring job satisfaction mediation, while middle-level supervisors function as indispensable multi-level change agents. This research contributes a Contextual Modification of Dynamic Capability Theory, integrating psychological and structural dimensions into a socio-technical orchestration framework with clear implications for managers and policymakers.

References

Anggiani, S., & Fatonah, F. (2025). The impact of digital leadership and job satisfaction on Indonesian Generation Z’s job performance in the workplace. Intangible Capital, 21(3), 473–488. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.3088

Ansar, A., Arismunandar, A., Rasdiana, R., Ma’rifatin, S., Entrisnasari, F. V., & Nindhiani, R. (2026). Development and psychometric evaluation of a stakeholder perception scale of supervisors’ digital competencies for performance excellence (SDC-PE). Frontiers in Education, 10, 1703439. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1703439

Budiadi, H. (2026). A literature review on the influence of transformational leadership, emotional intelligence, and organizational culture on employee engagement in the digital era. Quality-Access to Success, 27(210), 32. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/27.210.32

Çetinkaya, B., & Sürücü, L. (2025). Contextualizing the links between digital leadership, creative self-efficacy and innovation performance. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(4), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i4.7774

Dubey, R., Bryde, D. J., Blome, C., Dwivedi, Y. K., Childe, S. J., & Foropon, C. (2024). Alliances and digital transformation are crucial for benefiting from dynamic supply chain capabilities during times of crisis: A multi-method study. International Journal of Production Economics, 269, 109166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109166

Fakhfakh, A., Noureldin, A., Aboueldahab, M., & Nabil, B. (2025). The role of digital leadership in the sustainable performance of Egyptian telecommunications companies: The mediating effect of digital organizational culture. International Journal of Industrial Engineering & Production Research, 36(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijiepr:36.1.2194

Jarkawi, Hartanto, C. F. B., Judijanto, L., Rangkuti, Z., & Hasbi, M. (2025). The role of digital transformation in educational management: Innovation, challenges, and its impact on school quality. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 52(10). https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.52.10.6

Mulyani, S. (2024). The impact of creativity and digital leadership on decision-making quality: Implications for public service performance. Decision Science Letters, 13, 633–646. https://doi.org/10.5267/dsl.2024.4.008

Ningsih, S., Irwansyah, R., Syahputra, D., Syera, I. A., & Tirtana, M. A. (2026). Integrating digital technologies for sustainable tourism: Quantitative assessment of tech-enabled organizational practices. Advance Sustainable Science, Engineering and Technology (ASSET), 8(2), 02602040-01-016. https://doi.org/10.26877/asset.v8i2.2589

Takyi, K. N., Miloslava, C., Bludo, G. Y., & Aloysius, S. (2025). Navigating the digital transformation path: The role of digital leadership and technological capability through the dynamic capability model. Sciendo, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101183

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

Umah, E. C., Imron, A., Hadi, S., & Praherdhiono, H. (2023). Madrasah principal digital leadership innovation in digital learning transformation. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(3), e03365. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n3-025

Xue, Q., Mamun, A. A., Hosen, M., & Yang, Q. (2026). Dynamic capabilities in higher education: How big data analytics fuels digital service innovation in Chinese HEIs. Education and Information Technologies, 31, 2713–2736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-05655-5

Published

2026-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles